Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

Engagement over selling any day of the week

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Have you ever been at a 21st birthday party where the best friend gives a speech that sounds more like their own biography? How about a wedding where the best man’s speech forgets trivial matters such as how the couple first met? Looking at a number of company fan pages on Facebook the other day, I was reminded of not only these scenarios but of a speech given at a charity dinner I attended about six years ago. As with most charity dinners, there were a number of suppliers that offered products or services in exchange for brand exposure, with one major sponsor given a speaking role at the event. The speech given by the representative for the company that night lacked any connection to the charity they were there supporting and unsurprisingly, by the end of the speech, there were almost as many people taking bathroom breaks as there were remaining within the function room.

Like the speaker at this event, it can be difficult for brands to get the ever tricky balance between promotion and engagement within social media right. So what are the main things?

Can you hear me now? Meaningful content is in trend within social media

Can you hear me now? Meaningful content is in trend within social media




The art of showing

How many Facebook fan pages or Twitter feeds have you seen where a brand is all too eager to throw a promotion at you? It kind of makes sense; however, the problem is that this is the first reaction every other brand has as well, which means that the world of brand pages (on various social media channels) turns homogenous and pretty repetitive. But it doesn’t have to be like this. Sure, some brands like media and news channels have an easier job by turning their social media presence into channels that provide continual news updates. But what about the rest of us? The trick is to subtlety convey your brand personality through high utility offerings. As an example, stacks of people love trivia, so it was encouraging to learn that Fancast: a US company offering TV shows online, made a ‘trivia with prize’ offering for their Twitter followers which resulted in referrals from their feed rising by 400%. Much like a ballerina at a Bulgarian weight lifting conference, differentiation goes a long way in social media and sometimes all this means is showing more and telling less.


Competitions attract the masses

Most of us have heard about the success generated by Tourism Queensland’s ‘Best Job in the World’ competition. A great lesson from this was that competitions, with the right mix, can yield phenomenal and sometimes unexpected results. It’s probably occurred to you that not all brands have such an impressive arsenal of prizes that are still ‘on strategy’ as in Tourism Queensland’s case. This simply means that brands need to go beyond the obvious. I know that a prize from a major book retailer of having lunch with my favourite author is more of a payoff than getting a couple of free books sent to me every month for a year (or ten years for that matter). The competition can have multiple touch points (your website as well as all the usual social media suspects) and when you add up all the channels you will discover it’s not too hard to populate it. There’s no reason for great prizes to be reserved only for brands with sex appeal.


Not everything needs to be transparent

You don’t need to strive to achieve transparency if there’s nothing to gain from it. We’ve all heard the story about the brand that makes their online conversations public with customers. It begins with the customer saying, “brand X sucks,” to which brand X replies “we’re sorry to hear this – how can we help you?” Although a couple of years ago this seemed novel and daring, the reality is that any user willing to say this is unlikely to still be around to respond to your query and everyone else that is still around will see your conversation haplessly terminated. So, if you cannot censor your conversations and you’re in a category that traditionally receives more flack than other industries – such as telcos and banks – it could be better to make your conversations ancillary rather than the focus. A great example is on your branded Facebook fan page. Rather than having your ‘wall’ conversations as the landing page, you can now have it coded so that your online competition or awesome branded event is the landing tab when your users enter the page.

As one great man with an odd name – Zig Ziglar – said: “You will get all you want in life if you help other people get what they want”. There is much to gain from brands reapplying this type of thinking to current trends online, particularly through social media.


Social Media – The New Channel to Complain?

Monday, January 18th, 2010

This article is based on a study by Nora Ganim Barnes entitled “Exploring the Link Between Customer Care and Brand Reputation in the Age of Social Media” from the Society for New Communications Research. http://www.newcommreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/customer-care.pdf

Interested in getting a job with a retailer? Signing up with a new internet service provider – or perhaps you’re looking for an avenue to slam an existing one?

In social media, consumers now know where to aim.

In social media, consumers now know where to aim.


Whatever your pursuit is, it’s unlikely that you’ll be doing your research from a corporate brochure, or shouting down the telephone to a computerised operator when Google and Facebook are at your virtual doorstep. Despite a large sum of free positive publicity that is derived from blogging, it is estimated that 59.1% (Barnes) of social media users use these channels as avenues to ‘vent’ their frustrations with companies. That being said, companies facing this negative publicity must make an important decision: run for the hills or confront and reconcile?

Unless you are a household brand that a perspective partner or customer should know everything about, the chances are they will throw your name into a search engine. As the study above reveals: 72% of people surveyed choose to opt for this course of action. If you think this is predominantly teenagers with too much time on their hands, think again, as a large proportion are in the desirable 25-55 year old age bracket, university educated, and earning over 100K each year. In some cases the larger the company the easier target they are, with a Google search under “WalMart” revealing an employee being trampled to death by eager shoppers, a unethical decision to boost Wii sales, and impending labour lawsuits that could total up to $640 Million – all under the first page of search results. Mark my words, no one is safe.

A brand’s resistance to jumping on the social media bandwagon is understandable. To a large extent launching a branded application on Facebook or even a company profile page holds the company at ransom to less than positive comments. With groups calling themselves highly imaginative names such as I hate Optus, this can be daunting. However, these comments are going to be made with or without your consent, so you may as well jump on board and utilise this as free market research, or in a truly optimistic fashion, try to resolve issues with disgruntled customers. If the statistic of ‘95%’ rings true (i.e that this percentage of complaining customers will do business with you again if the matter is dealt with swiftly) (TrainingZone) it can be a great avenue to recapture lost customers. At the very least you can promote your brand as being ‘in the know’ with where your customers are by being there too.

Truth be told, most interest groups on Facebook are overwhelmingly positive and comments posted can provide a number of benefits to companies. From “Where can I buy this product?” to “Are more flavours being released?” – it generates conversation and a buzz about existing brands and products. Given the astonishing number of users attached to some of these groups (Pepsi – 151,000 fans, Nike 831,000 fans, or, closer to home, Vegemite – 85,000 fans and Toobs – 21,000 fans) useful qualitative information can, and should be collected on the brand’s image or product lines and used wisely.

When it comes to getting criticism through social media channels, not all companies are on a level playing field – with a disproportionate number of service provider companies getting hit the hardest. These companies need to be the most strategic with the channels they use. If the major complaint is slow response rates, engage them immediately with a customer support alternative on Twitter. If you’re being labeled a ‘money grubbing prostitute’, give your customers a free branded application on Facebook or iPhone with discrete brand placement and high utility value. If you’re being attacked on a recent TVC that has failed to cut the mustard with your target audience, come clean and run a promotional competition seeking personal TVC entries via MySpace.

The floodgates that once protected companies from public criticism have now well and truly been activated across the social media space. The only question now is: how will you react to it?

Concert Streaming: Crowd Surf Your Way Online

Monday, January 18th, 2010

You’re almost there. Just a few clicks away. As your clock ticks over to 12:04 you realise your computer is taking an increasingly long time to load. Following much distress, it finally completes its loading with a dreaded HTML error alert. As you then frantically go back to reconfirm, a heart wrenching message reading, ‘Sorry, this concert is now sold out’ appears just as your clock ticks over to 12:05….

This all too common scenario has partly encouraged bands to now create live streaming of concerts. Of course, the profitability of live streaming has been demonstrated nicely by companies such as Ustream and Livestream, but with Facebook starting to get involved in the space and YouTube recently engaging in their own streaming of live concerts, things could be about to get much more interesting.

Online Concerts

As far as online concerts go, a lot has happened in the last month. One of the more memorable events was the Foo Fighters concert: live from studio 606, which was powered by Livestream and accessible through Facebook. Not only did this create a greater level of engagement among fans (as they could contribute to conversations between other fans and friends during the live performance) the concert was able to efficiency target the enthusiasts in the first place by tapping into the various fan pages of the band to generate guest invites. Unsurprisingly, the concert also had huge potential to expand, with each invitee of the 30,000 strong crowd, given the ability to invite their own friends.

Accompanying imageAkin to this, YouTube has also been active, streaming their second major concert (U2 live from Rose Bowl) and combining it with Twitter feeds to generate more traffic into their site. Although the combination of Twitter with live broadcasting means that the content can now be accessible to users, there may be nothing more irritating to the hard core fans than having to divert part of their attention from the concert towards fanatics posting incessant variations of ‘I luv this track’ throughout the duration. As painful as that might sound, it probably paled to the number of users twittering during YouTube’s feature length screening of the classic: Taxi Driver last month (‘Are you talking to me?’ anyone…). Still, you rarely get something for nothing.

Social media integration aside, it’s no surprise that YouTube has been slow to monetise their content. Although getting better at it now – with sponsored videos and related Adwords – the company’s loses are projected to be $470 million this year alone. Even though it’s unlikely that they will move towards charging viewers for their service, all this trialing just might be in anticipation of a change to their classic model of ‘free content on demand for all,’ – but fingers crossed that it’s not.

Despite these recent events, concerts can never be replaced, but it’s inevitable that they will continue to develop a life of their own online. Once this transition moves beyond the experimental stage that it’s in now, and assuming that it avoids charging users per view, the live streams in the future will likely become hugely populated by sponsors. Although the commercial nature might detract from the experience, it will at least hide the costs from the viewers and, in a few years time, may well become an accepted way to ‘attend’ concerts.

Until it reaches this point, I for one am excited about the shift. After all, there’s nothing worse than forking out $120 to see a band play live, only to discover the majority of their songs are from their recent album that you know nothing about. By just linking your computer to a projector with a VGA cable you can essentially create your own concert, in real time, for free, and restrict the screening to your own network of friends.

Of course, with all the moshing going on, you’ll still probably encounter a few sweaty bodies along the way. With this being the case, at least you’ll now know who they all are.

  • Archives